As we’re experiencing some technical issues, the latest court papers are available on request (email@example.com)
10 January 2016: Energy minister still taking secret actions on Nuclear Energy
9 December 2016: Are SA’s Energy Plans a Threat to Citizen’s Human Right’s?
1 December 2016: Our ‘People’s Statement’ aims to give a voice to the people of SA
16 November 2016: Parliament going backwards into the dark ages
14 November 2016: Those without integrity must be held accountable
11 October 2016: Faith Community responds to the Nuclear Build Briefing
8 October 2016: Let the courts decide
22 September 2016: Nuclear court date set
9 September 2016: Nuclear procurement – government ignores court case
18 August 2016: Nuclear court case – more missing documents requested
29 June 2016: Earthlife Africa press release: WorleyParsons – more evidence of Rosatom nuclear scandal
12 June 2016: Government finally replies to nuclear court case
17 May 2016: Government dragging its heels in nuclear court case
11 May 2016: No nuclear bail outs
6 April 2016: Is this sanity or incompetence?
28 January 2016: Nuclear goes ahead despite omission from NDC
For more information please visit nuclearcostssa.org to find all the latest news on nuclear and uranium mining, it’s dangerous predecessor which is threatening the Karoo.
SAFCEI and Earthlife Africa (Johannesburg) launched their court application on the 12th October 2015. A court date has been set for 13 & 14 December 2016.
For further information, contact Liz McDaid ( +27 827315643 / firstname.lastname@example.org) or Dominique Doyle (+27 79 331 2028 / email@example.com)
In brief, ELA-Jhb and SAFCEI are going to challenge the legality and constitutionality of:
- the intergovernmental agreement on strategic partnership and nuclear cooperation signed with Russia last year (Russian IGA);
- the tabling of the Russian IGA in Parliament under a provision that makes the agreement binding on the international plane without the need for parliamentary ratification;
- the tabling of outdated IGAs on nuclear cooperation entered into with the USA and Republic of Korea;
- the failure by the Minister in terms of s34 of the Electricity Regulation Act, 2006 (ERA), in consultation with NERSA and in accordance with a procedurally fair public participation process, to make a determination that new electricity generation capacity is required from nuclear power, and the percentage that is required;
- the failure by the Minister in terms of s34 of the Electricity Regulation Act, 2006 (ERA), read with s217 of the Constitution, in consultation with NERSA and in accordance with a procedurally fair public participation process, to require that the procurement of such nuclear new generation capacity must take place in terms of a specified procurement system that is fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective;
- various decisions by the Minister and/or government to facilitate, organise, commence and/or proceed with the procurement of nuclear new generation capacity prior to making the necessary s34 nuclear determination and nuclear procurement system decision.